The Hard Truth: Part 3 - Allan Palmer: Civic Responsibility
Date: October 19, 2023
Dear, Ms. Tarazano,
It is with tremendous pleasure, I write you, I am of the opinion my contributions to this institution can help get management thinking, even if they refuse to act. For thinking is always a good thing. I will make it clear this is not a private document, and no reply to this document is necessary.
I take this opportunity to write to you, on three (3) matters of great concern. The first matter is the: new Los Angeles City Public Library: Acceptable Usage Policy, to access the library internet using the library computer network. The second matter, is one all library patron should be extremely concerned about: Use of aerosol Narcotics in the library, and the third and most important matter, is one that is most dear to me; which is one of my nation's concerns.
Matters of St. Vincent and the Grenadines Concern.
I am a citizen of St. Vincent and the Grenadines (S.V.G), a small underdeveloped or third world country, that is located in the eastern Caribbean; I am a Garifuna by descendant, one of two indigenous people groups in S.V.G. Our country has an ailing economy. We have absolutely no marketable minerals or precious stones. All we have is sea, sand, sunlight and an active volcano. Our arable lands are extremely limited. This limit is due to our country small size (152 square miles) even so, the economy of St. Vincent and the Grenadines; is an agriculture base economy.
In order to give you an understanding of who I am and the gravitas of the reason why I write, Let me take the time to give you a little related background information about myself.
Upon my request, in 2012, I was granted the authority to reside within this country: the United States of America, with the full privilege of a USA citizen. This permission was granted to me by: the United States Federal Government. I had and still have the privilege, of obtaining full citizenship in this: the USA, within four years (2016) after I was granted permission to live here.
I never took any of the steps needed, to become a citizen of this the United States of America. This is so, for the simple fact: I don't want to neither do I have a need or intention of become a citizen of this country; I do not intend to stay here any longer than I have too or needs to. Apart from the fact I do not want to become a citizen of this country; I have no intent to pursue the all elusive "American Dream".
I have all the talents and learnt abilities, to go in pursuit of the American Dream; in any manner I choose to. this is so, because I did not waste my youth, I have the ability and the proficiency to work with my hands and with tools, as an Auto-Mechanic, a furniture maker, a construction carpenter, a boat builder, and in many other fields. Even the beautiful burgundy, red and green back pack, I used on a daily basis; was made by me.
I am sure you could conclude by reading this document, I am a very prolific writer. I have written and I still writes on a variety of topics, articles which were published in the S.V.G's newspapers and in two Caribbean online newspapers.
I have a large catalog of original songs, short stories, full-length stories, poems, musicals and screen plays which I wrote. Some on paper and others in my head just to be transcribed. Because I have no interest in, and I will never be interested in the American dream, I will never employ my skill and or talents to go in pursuit of such.
Now that you have an understanding of who I am and where I stand let me get into the real reason for my writing.
I noticed the Los Angeles Public Library (L.A.P.L) main branch upgraded its computer systems, an upgrade that was completed at the end of September 2023. In a similar manner to that which was done, to the Los Angeles County Law Library (L.A.C.L.L), which is a comparatively small operation when compared to the L.A.P.L. The L.A.C.L.L was gifted, an upgrade in their computer system which included soft and hardware upgrade.
The Santa Monica Public Library (S.M.P.L) was also gifted a series of state of the arts printing machines. The printers were the most up to date in printing technology, that were available.
Like the Los Angeles County Law Library and the Santa Monica Public Library, the modus operandi of the upgrade of the Los Angeles public library is the same. If I am concluding correctly; and I know I am, like the other two libraries: in Los Angeles County I mentioned; the recent upgrade to the library's computer systems, was a gift from the Prime Minister of St. Vincent and the Grenadines" Ralph E. Gonsalves.
What is laughable; is the reverse in roles that occurred her; the fact PM Gonsalves: the political leader, of a third world country is actually giving aid to a first world or developed country.
What is extremely hilarious is: While PM Gonsalves who administer the affairs of a third world country with an annual budget estimate of just a meager one point eight four (EC $1.48 b) billion East Caribbean dollars, which is equivalent to five hundred and sixty-seven (U.S.D $567 m) million United States Dollars; is giving aid to a city in a develop country: specifically, The City of Santa Monica.
While that same city: the City of Santa Monica is spending, over nine hundred (USD $900 + m) plus million US dollars, on a facility, to clean the water runoff (rain water etc.) that are collected in the city drainage system before they release it into the sea.
All this is happening, while in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the Government is using a World Bank loan of two hundred and ninety-eight million (U.S.D $ 298. m) dollars on a port modernization project; and in that project they repaired the sewage line that runs along the sea floor, which was damaged over forty years ago by Hurricane Allan, which pumps raw Sewage into the sea in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
Let me put this into perspective, in simple language, while the city of Santa Monica, who was the beneficiary of foreign aid from a poor third world country: St. Vincent and the Grenadines, that city spent in excess approximately forty (40%) percent of or the approximated value of one hundred and forty (140%) percent of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, yearly estimated expenditure, to remove minor toxin from the water collected in its drainage system; to ensure the waters that runs into the sea, is clean.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines on the other hand, even with the work done to repair the submarine sewage lines, we are still pumping raw sewage directly into the sea. I will not burden you with the poor state of our health system, the poor state of the country’s infrastructure, the high un-employment etc.
I have a sneaking suspicion, the Los Angeles City library that was the beneficiary of foreign aids from St. Vincent and the Grenadines, has about a yearly operational cost of about five hundred million (US $500. M) US dollars. which is close to the operation expenditure of St. Vincent and the Grenadines yearly budget. And the library neither its staff is not considered an essential agency or workers.
I am sure the board is not aware, of how Prime Minister: Gonsalves, obtained the monies, he is so generously lavishing in Los Angeles County, as gifts to the county and its cities libraries.
Check-able Facts.
Let me first fill you in on some check-able facts. I am sure this library is fully aware it is unlawful and criminal for any person, business organization (private and or Government) to accept gifts and to benefit from that which is believed to be, suspected to be and are proven to be the proceeds of crimes. These offences are criminal offences: of money Laundering: 18 U.S. Code § 1956 - California Penal Code 186.10. and other related offences.
When such is discovered, any such person company, organization (private and or government) who benefited from the proceeds of crime has certain responsibility to their state, their nation etc. and the deprived person and or persons. Such duty are as follows to:
1. Report the matter to the appropriate law enforcement authority.
2. Take steps to stop benefiting from such proceeds
3. Hand over to the law-enforcement authority the gift or the value of such gift, that were the proceeds of crime.
4. To make themselves available to assist in any investigation that may derive from the gift.
It is public knowledge, within the closely knitted community of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves operated a failed law practice. A practice that was subsidized on a monthly basis, by his mother, who was a land owner, a farmer and a small grocery operator.
We are also aware, when Prime Minister Gonslaves got involved in elected politics, he did not declare his assets, as the law, of St. Vincent and the Grenadines require. This was so because, he did not have any personal assets (no accumulated wealth) to declare. Vincentian’s knowledge of Prime Minister Gonsalves failed practice and lack of declarable assets was confirmed with his business tax returns.
PM Gonsalves mother died several years ago, unfortunately for PM. Gonsalves, he has several siblings who have an equal stake in his mother's Estate. We must also consider that Ralph Gonsalves under eighty thousand (EC $80.000.00) East Caribbean dollars salary per year; puts him on par with and in most cases below a minimum wage of worker in this the United States of America.
When we consider one (EC $1.) East Caribbean dollar is equivalent to .381 USA cent, therefore PM Ralph E. Gonsalves six thousand, six hundred ($6,600.00) East Caribbean Dollars monthly salary, which is a significant salary for our country. However, this is equivalent to two Thousand, four hundred and ninety-one dollars (US $2, 491. 00) U.S.D. per month.
Base on Prime Minister Gonslaves tax returns, for the past 20 years, he cannot afford to give any such gift, from his personal resources/assets. The math just does not add up.
Please be reminded, not because Ralph Gonsalves holds the post of Prime Minister, it does not give him absolute power over the scarce resources of our country. There exist in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a system of laws and an administration system of government with checks and balances to defend against corruption. such as the other institutions of the government, the Parliamentary Opposition of the West Minister Parliamentary System etc.
Any such gifts must be brought to the House of Parliament, in the form of a bill, there must be three reading of that bill, in the house of Parliament, a debate of the pros and the cons of the bill and a parliamentary vote for or against any such. I will bring it to the attention of all involved there were no such bills drafted, and brought to the House of Parliament, read for a debate and vote upon, which allowed PM Ralph Gonsalves the privilege to give such aid.
Therefore, any such monies spent on behalf of the Government was illegally obtained, and constitutes a crime of theft in one of its legal forms. We all are all aware a head of Government, must receive certain authority, from his parliament to spend or use the nations resources.
It is no secret in most Caribbean countries, St. Vincent and the Grenadines constitution is poorly developed, and because of such it is a document that should be administered by honest men. Prime Minister: Ralph E. Gonsalves took and continue to take advantage of the poorly drafted instrumentals S.V.G constitution and laws) in appointing men and women whom he has manipulative control over, in key positions that affords him to get away with corruption and criminal activities.
P.M Ralph Gonsalves allegation of Corruption.
Let me take the time to give you one such example of corruption perpetrated against the laws of St. Vincent and the Grenadines by Prime Minister, Ralph E. Gonsalves. Please take note at the end of this section I will ensure to put information where those who are concerned about the truth can find first class verification.
When Ralph Gonsalves was elected Prime Minister in 2001, he appointed his junior Partner Colin Williams from his failed law practice to the post of the Director of Public Prosecution. In 2007 a female police officer: Michelle Andrews a female police officer, filed a formal police reported, against the Prime Minister of rape and sexual assault.
After the allegations by the female police officer; a Canadian Human Rights lawyer: Margaret Parsons, file a formal police report against Prime Minister Gonsalves. This lawyer claimed allegation sexually assaulted by P. M Gonsalves upon her, while she was in the office of Prime Minister. She visited said office, on official business. For a regular citizen these were open and close cases.
Ralph Gonsalves instructed his junior partner turned DPP to nolle prosequi the cases against him as well as to change the laws, as it relates to private citizen filing private criminal cases, against anyone who have criminally wrong them. P. M. Gonsalves made it impossible, for his accusers, to get a trial as the laws permits for over one hundred or so years.
What you will find interesting; the change of the law as it relates to private citizen filing private criminal cases against any one, who have criminally wrong them was change after lawyers for the two accusers filed their private criminal cases against Prime Minister Ralph E. Gonsalves. They law was enforced retroactively to protect Prime Minister Ralph E. Gonslves.
The preponderance of the evidence was against P.M Ralph Gonslaves, and would have resulted in his conviction and imprisonment. I can hear the legal minds and professionals saying, can there be such quality of evidence in a case? Please let me explain.
This was and still is so for the simple fact; in P.M. Gonsalves' effort to defend himself, against the allegations of rape and sexual assault brought against him, by the female police officer; P.M Gonsalves, made available to the media, a pre-recorded and edited, audio press release.
In that audio press release, without the pressure of being crossed-examine, by counsel before a judge and a juror in a criminal court of law, and without any duress, declared in his own voice, At the time the date and at the place of the alleged rape and sexual assault, he gave the female police officer a reassuring kiss.
Let me simplify this for you, Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves in his own voice, placed himself at the scene of the alleged rape and sexual assault, at the time of the same of the sexual assault and rape (at an hour in the new day when even the creatures of evil are asleep) and at the date of the alleged extremely serious sexual offence; confessed to the lease of the two extremely sexual offences: Sexual Assault.
The above incidents were published locally, regionally and internationally in the media and these incidents shows, the level P. M Ralph Gonsalves will go, to pervert the course of justice and dismantle the lawful structure of accountability. It is the same thing he did with the public account’s office and the office of the director of audit. These government bodies have not functioned for over a decade and a half.
As it stands accountability in our country is null and void; there is not a proper record of the exact state of financial affairs in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
I know P.M Ralph Gonsalves’ friend California register lawyer Richard Ross whose coffers were and are being fatten with illegal monies, P.M. Gonsalves unlawful misappropriated from the treasury of St. Vincent and the Grenadines will try to tell you I am fabricating stories about the Prime Minister.
I will confirmed, the two lawyers who represented Police Officer: Michelle Andrews and the Canadian Human Rights lawyer: Margret Parsons were Nicole Sylvester and Kay Bacchus-Baptiste. Ms. Sylvester is currently decease but Mrs. Bacchus-Baptiste is still alive and practicing. Her cell phone number is: 1 - 784 - *** - **** and she can be contacted on Face book at: https://www.facebook.com.
I am sure Mrs. Bacchus-Baptiste will be happy to accommodate your call and qualify any information in this document that you are in doubt about. I know for sure: Michell Andrews nor Margaret Parson will not object to the opportunity for the truth about their victimization being known.
When I return to St. Vincent and the Grenadines and take up the post of Prime Minister of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, I will ensure and oversee the investigation of the corrupt Ralph Gonsalves, government. I will be back here in California with evidence and a completed investigation demanding, the restoration of my countries monies that PM Gonsalve has embezzled and squander here in the County of Los Angeles California, on county and City institutions. I will be demanding such with interest.
Lest you conclude that it is impossible for me to become Prime Minister of St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Let me take the pleasure to remind you of a very popular fact. That David the son of Jessi an Israelite like me, was also estranged from his country and his people like I am, and like P.M. Ralph Gonsalves; King Saul who administered the affairs of Israel, employed all of Israel's resources to try to kill David; but failed at every effort.
Like David I am unconditionally faithful to the Creator God the God of Israel, and in the same way the Creator God: The God of Israel anointed David King of Israel, it is the same Creator God who put the heavy but pleasureful burden on my heart to be Prime Minister of my country St. Vincent and the Grenadines, not to sexploit and rape our women but to lead his people into righteousness and prosperity.
In the same way King Saul with his oppressive and misuse of the resources of Israel, could not prevent David from ascending the King of Israel, I have no doubt in my mind what-so-ever, Ralph Gonsalves, his misuse of the resources of S.V.G, the Los Angeles Police Department, the Sheriff Department and the FBI can NEVER STOP MY ASSENT to the office and the seat of Prime Minister St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
Los Angeles City Public Library: Acceptable Usage Policy. Reason #1
I came to Los Angeles, just over ten (10) years ago, and during my first week in the City of Los Angeles, California, I was introduced to the Los Angeles Public Library: a city establishment; where I began to use the service of the library. For the most part, I used the internet service both: the wireless service and via the library's network of computers.
I do not know for sure, how long the Los Angeles Public Library, have been offering internet service to its community via its network of computers, but ten years is a good enough benchmark to base my concerns on.
I used the internet facility at the Los Angeles Public Library on a fairly consistent basis, for several years, except for the period of time, during the COVID 19 pandemic and the post pandemic era, when mask was required to enter and remain in the libraries.
Prior to October 2nd, 2023, library patron accessing the internet via the library computer network, were not required to agree to any user policy. From my experience, this was so up to late September 2023. However, on October 2nd, 2023, after the alleged upgrade of the library computer systems, patrons are now.
required to agree to what is now called: Acceptable Usage Policy (AUP); before patron can access the internet, using the library computer network.
Given my experience living in Los Angeles, California and having seen the habitual oppressive nature of the people who are actively re-enslaving black people, I became suspicious and my suspicions led me to request and read the: Acceptable Usage Policy.
Upon greater review of the library’s Acceptable Usage Policy, there are some concerns, which I will raise on my behalf and on the behalf of the African American community, who uses the network of public libraries, ran by the city; the patrons who are most likely to be victimized by the library staff, the library security and the members of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) who are assigned to the main branch of the Los Angeles Public Library.
My first concern comes from lines 10-13 on pages #1 of the Acceptable Usage Policy. Before I get into it; let me make it clear, I do not have any problem with the library's effort to keep children who use the library facilities and or service, as well as, children in general safe. I personally hold fast to the opinion and active belief; no one; and I mean absolutely no one, should ever be made or allowed to benefit: financially, emotionally, psych-sexually or in any other way from the exploitation of a child or children. Child pornography is one of the ways people benefits psych-sexually from the exploitation of children.
What I have a problem with, is the word obscene, which appears several times in the library's: Acceptable Usage Policy. It is important to note obscene material, films, books, literature, etc. are not illegal but they have regulated usage, in the same way, alcohol is regulated and has even stronger regulations governing its accessibility, and its use. Nudity and the sex act is never obscene, but can be inappropriate and therefore becomes offensive. The inappropriate use, display and demonstration of the most mundane of things can become highly offensive.
I noticed the library in its acceptable Usage Policy, used obscene, as it is defined in: Title 18 section 1460 of the United States Code. Which dealt with the sale, advertisement etc. of obscene material etc. on federal premises. This does not mean, obscene material in any of its form is illegal, according to federal laws; for it is not.
To qualify this let us take a look at title 18 of section 1461, which deals with Abortions and those aspects that are related to abortions in the same manner, sec. 1460 dealt with obscene material. The sale of equipment, advertisement etc. for abortions and abortions related equipment and information are also prohibited on federal property.
We must be mindful this was the case while Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was still law and it is still so, now that the United States Supreme Court overturned that landmark ruling. It is important to note, the sales, advertisement etc. of any material upon federal property; is strictly prohibited that is unless, the person or persons who are so doing received some lawful federal instrument from a legitimate issuing federal body granting them the permission to so do.
We are all aware, nudity and the sex acts can be shown on public television, only at particular hours of the day (Late night), and on Cable and Satellite TV at any time of the day. The same are lawfully offered for sale and can be lawfully purchased in print: writing, graphic and videos format. That is because, Obscenity in its self is not illegal but it is regulated. Please bear in mind, not because a person (s) were/are disgusted with nudity and the sex act of others, it does not make it obscene. It may be highly inappropriate.
Obscene is defined as - The portrayal or description of sexual matters that is offensive or disgusting by accepted standards of morality and decency. The definition of obscene, did not say sexual matters are obscene, offensive or disgusting. However, the way they are portrayed and described. This means the how, the where and the when of the sexual matter; it is the appropriateness or lack thereof, of the matter that makes it offensive.
Let me bring it to your attention, based on our changing society and our changing value system; today the following points to prove obscenity are all relative to many things.
1. offensive
2. disgusting
3. accepted standards
4. morality
5. decency.
Another valid point that goes to my discussion, base of the quoted law in the Los Angeles City Public Library: Acceptable Usage Policy; Title 8 section 2256, the word obscene is not found. because the law makers were fully aware, the word obscene and all of it points to prove are relative to a lot of things. However, the word that is important in this law is: "Sexually Explicit Conduct".
The term: Sexually Explicit Conduct" is self-explanatory but it is explained in detail in the quoted piece of law and covers what is considered a lot of normal sex act. Sex acts when done to or with a minor, becomes a federally criminal liable; indictable offense. A minor being anyone under the age of 18 years old. Anyone who participates in any Sexually Explicit Conduct, documents, possesses, views and distributes any such documentations involving a minor; are also federally criminal liable upon indictment.
I myself have no interest, nor do I find it necessary or finds pleasure in viewing of nudity and or the sexual acts, in any of its form, not in public places, in magazines, films etc. However, my purpose for making the above points are for the undermentioned reasons.
Once while I used the facilities of this fine establishment: the Los Angeles Public Library, As I used the library computer, while I was concerned with my business, my eyes inadvertently, saw the computer screen of an adult patron, in the adult section of the library. That patron was viewing sexually graphic material.
I was disturbed by the fact, that one will use the library facility for that purpose. In my mind, such use was inappropriate. However, because of my location: proximity and angle to the patron in question; whenever, I looked up from the computer screen, as we often do; I saw the sexually graphic material they looked at.
I brought this matter to the library staff/Librarian's attention. I was told, the individual is an adult, in the adult section of the library, that person has a right, to use his/her internet time, in whatever manner they so desire. They further said they cannot sanction a person or restrict them to do something they have no interest in.
I thought the librarian's or library worker's explanation was reasonable and justifiable. After that day, I have seen many individuals using the library computers network and internet to look at sexually graphic and nude material. I did not become offended, because I knew, they were only exercising their rights.
I have seen many people who are prone to victimization who uses the library network and internet to view sexually explicit material. Hence one of the reasons I am concern about the new library: Acceptable Usage Policy; which can be enforced for any reason against the people, who in the library staff and or management opinion are undesirable.
Los Angeles City Public Library: Acceptable Usage Policy. Reason #2
Another troubling aspect of the Acceptable Usage Policy is found in lines ***** of page two. which dealt with the distribution of unsolicited,
1. advertisement,
2. harassment,
3. Libeling or
4. Slander of others.
The question I will like to ask is: which of the members of the library board of directors, the directors and or the library workers business is it, if I used the library computer and internet system, to prepare and send from my personal email, or post on my personal social media account or social media platform any unsolicited advertisement, slanderous libeling material etc.
Let us take for example, I speak and write some very difficult and uncomfortable truth about individuals, companies, and race especially about white people. Truth what the average person hears them they may thing the same are fabrications, slander and lies. However, I never discuss anything in isolation, but in context.
Which of the library staff is going to take the time to verify what is facts and what is not, who is going to determine what is libel, slander etc. The library is making policies to be use conveniently; to disenfranchised the already victimized African American community who use its service and are already victims of unfair treatment by the library staff, security and police officer assigned at the facility.
Another thing, the library is also taking on responsibilities to deal with matters, they are not authorized by law to, is not technically and professionally equip to deal with. Matters that already have the appropriate venues where such can be adequately and lawfully handled.
There are several other issues, I can address about the library A.U.P but it does not directly affect me or the already disenfranchised African American Community. However, before I close this section of this document, I will make an observation.
Observation:
I can say with confidence, the Library's Acceptable Usage Policy, is a poorly edited version of the library’s internal internet and email policy; that is now applied to a completely different and unrelated purpose. This is evident in the following eg.
1. Line ____ page _ the words: By community standards. this is only applicable if the library has and operates a Social Media Platform which they don't, of if the library has an internal email system where staff has access to the email address
database; and are capable of sending group and or email to all staff on the system.
2. Line _____ Page __ the authority to disable filtering software.
3. Line ___ Page __ " Staff should follow the library material section guidelines.
I must also mention here, the points I address in detail as it relates to the Acceptable Usage Policy, are all quite appropriate and applicable to govern, the library staff, usage of the library's internal internet and email. I address such, because it is still a part of the Library's Acceptable Usage Policy still stands and patrons can be punished for such inapplicable violations.
Use of Narcotic in the Library.
On Tuesday 10th of October, 2023, or there about, at about 20:45 PM. I visited the Lower Level 3 (LL3) male wash room. I had an urgent physiological matter I had to deal with.
When I entered the washroom there was a strong odor of cigarette smoke in the washroom. While I waited for a stall, I saw a tall, older man exit one of the stall smoking what appeared to be a cigarette.
I went ahead and I used the toilet facility, with the impression the, odor will soon leave the area by means of the toilet extraction fan. (The extrication fans, are responsible for continuously removing fowl air, which can become dangerous to one's health, to ensure the toilets enclosure, that is without natural ventilation are always properly ventilated). However, it appeared as if, the toilet extraction fan(s) was turned off; because the odor persisted and was of the same magnitude when I left the toilet as when I entered.
However, while I was in the washroom, I noticed my perception was extremely altered. I experienced a level of intoxication that cannot be derived from second hand cigarette smoke.
I will be lying, if I said I saw anyone doing drugs in the washroom, the only thing I saw, which was against library rules, was the older, tall man smoking, what appeared to be a cigarette, in the washroom.
However, On Thursday 28th of September, 2023, about 4:45, PM, or there about, whilst I was in the reading area of LL3, I saw the same tall, older man, lit a pipe with some unknown substance in it, took a suck on the pipe which resulted in a big mist of what appear to be smoke; released into the air. From the behavior of the library patron present, I got the impression those type of behaviors were normal behaviors. I cannot say it was normal, because it was the first time, I saw any such thing.
Events like these are extremely dangerous for children, and none addicts with addictive personality. Such behaviors could set a recovering addict back many years back and bring to naught many years of hard work trying to keep and remain drug free.
Sign. Allan H. F. Palmer
cc. Los Angeles City Council
Board of commissioner Los Angeles Public Library
City of Santa Monica City Council
Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
Board of Governor of the Los Angeles County Law Library
Directors Los Angeles Public Library
Eva Mitnick - Engagement and learning
Karen Malone - Library Service
Ana M. Campos, Assistant Director
Lauren Skinner - Library Services
.png)


Comments
Post a Comment